Mahlon Juma Nyongesa2026-08-262026-08-262026-08-062454-6186https://irepository.aua.ac.ke/handle/123456789/975Full text articleThis study sought to investigate the presence of psychopathic behaviors among faculty members using a quantitative descriptive design with a sample of 130 faculty members. Data from a self-constructed questionnaire were analyzed using SPSS 27 for statistical treatment. Faculty members demonstrated low levels of psychopathic behaviors. This is attributed to their religious value system and the integration of faith in learning and teaching. Being aged 18 – 44 years or aged 45 – 64 does not make one more vulnerable to psychopathic experiences. Regardless of age, the psychopathic experiences are the same. Being a faculty member or HOD/Dean does not make a difference in psychopathic behaviors. Any university faculty job level is vulnerable to psychopathic behaviors. The One-way ANOVA test for a significant difference showed that the psychopathic behaviors of faculty members across the Divisions do not significantly differ, as they adhere to the same education system and share religious values. A phenomenological study would spell out the lived experiences. A convergent parallel design could complement personal and organizational factors. Besides, the study could expand the sample size to include public institutions across Sub-Saharan African countries and use standardized and validated instruments to enhance reliability and improve generalizability. An examination of the influence of organizational support, leadership style, and mental health resources on psychopathic experiences would be ideal.enPsychopathySociopathsFaculty membersAdventist UniversitiesArticle